FAQs

No.  We do not remove either a person or address.  

Our focus is mail-in ballots to ineligible and preposterous addresses.

We will not disenfranchise anyone, nor will we participate in disenfranchising any person.  

If Phineas, who is registered to vote at a park bench, shows up to vote, that’s fine.  

Mail cannot be delivered to a park bench, and someone may vote for Phineas – so we protect Phineas and the rest of the electorate

We use mostly publicly available data.  

We use the official Secretary of State voter databases whenever possible.  

We import property tax records for comparison of the building description whenever possible.  

We import public databases like UPS locations, hospital locations, hotel locations etc

None.  

We are not looking for any kind of fraud.  Nor do we imply that the anomalies we find are fraudulent.

We find anomalies.  

Some may be illegal – like a person registered to vote in a vacant lot.  

Some are bad data like 143,000 addresses in Colorado – in the official voter roll – where the zip code does not match the city.

Some are hilarious – like the person in the Midwest registered to vote at a prison – that has been closed for years!

Every such anomaly lowers confidence in U.S. elections.  

We expose these anomalies so they are fixed, and voter rolls can become accurate.
Every voter address should be scanned by an artificial intelligence (AI) engine to take the same address, if presented in multiple ways, and bring it into a uniform address type.

Yes.

We take several, up to hundreds – of copies of a voter roll on different dates, compare them and find subtle, yet important anomalies.  

For instance, Billie votes from a frat house.  

Not a problem across 1 voter roll, but we show Billie has been voting from the frat house for 20 years – thus an issue.  

We also show that Billie is 105 years old.  Another anomaly.

We show Billie is a woman – thus probably should not be live at a fraternity house.

While these are funny, we expose these by the thousands in every state we study.

Such examples, by the thousands exist in our voter rolls and they undermine confidence in elections.

Yes.

In Georgia, for instance, we have the property tax rolls for many of the large counties.  Eventually we will add every county.

We compare the property tax roll with the voter roll.  The voter roll shows Wilma is registered at a 123 Elmont Street, for instance.  

The voter roll tells us nothing about that address.

We compare that address with the property tax roll and learn it is a gas station.

We compare it with Google street-mapping generating a photo that this gas station is in a desolate area – no apartment there.  

Thus, we find an anomaly.

We do this with 3 clicks, instantly showing the result on a phone or tablet.

The real time nature of our comparison keeps everyone in the system looking at the same data, at the same time, all the time.

When everyone sees the same data – honesty prevails.

We discovered in 2022, in one large county, the election commission or other government official added over 18,000 new voters days before the election.  

These were invisible to at least one party’s political candidates.

Our recommendation is to monitor – during early voting – wherever possible, the voter rolls of a state, daily, compare them, show everyone, from any party if new voters have been added after the legal date to do so

Yes.

We built the system called the Dark Money Tracking System – to track NGOs, every dollar coming in – from any source, documenting it.  

We track every dollar the NGO gives to any other organization.  

We track every director or employee of the NGO – and any relationship with any other NGO dating back years.

With a single click, we show relationships among NGOs who coordinate their activities for political and other purposes.

There has never been a real time system to track such massive data and its interrelationships.

Our Dark Money Tracking System makes the relationships of money and politics – via tax-exempt organizations, completely transparent.

There are only 2 known 100% complete databases of every federal contribution since the FEC started keeping track of contributions in 1975.

One is the FEC itself – and it is massively difficult to traverse.  It also changes all the time, rendering prior data questionable.

The second source is our Common Sense Elections FEC system – with over 680,000,000 records – and we maintain the full accuracy of the system.  

Thus, we can show any changes the FEC made to its system – and we can show every donated dollar, track it through the system and tie it to donors.

Every donation, ever made, to any Federal candidate, from any source, tracked in real time, across almost 700 million records – from a tablet – provided with Fractal quantum technology.

We are funded by donations from citizens.

The question of whether illegal aliens are voting has been answered by others.  It is now reported weekly states are finding illegal aliens voting.

There is no database of illegal aliens available to the public, thus we must use other techniques.

We can track any address in any state we monitor, to see if it is a legitimate address, then determine if registrants are aggregating at that address.

For any address we use time series analysis to see that on date 1, there are 5 people at that location, 6 weeks later there are 12, then a month later there are 35.  

This does not prove they are illegal aliens.  It does, however, show ballot point aggregation so it serves as a starting point.

Relational technology is a tech relic of the 1980s.  Major corporations are moving away from it for their new systems.

Relational technology is massively complex, requires data centers so energy intensive they must be built near power plants.  

Our family of technologies finds anomalies in seconds, across billions of records, so economically relational database cannot compete.

Some of our technology eliminates the need for large data centers.

Every citizen contribution to our team is magnified because using advanced quantum speed technology, we can do for $100 what it takes our adversaries $1,000 or more to perform. 

Many of our analyses are economically out of reach for current technology.

We have decades of experience in A.I.  

Some of our team members worked at the MIT Artificial Intelligence Lab.  

We currently use several A.I. subsystems for voter rolls.  

One such system is the A.I. address matching engine.

A.I. thrives in our technology environment due to our exponentially faster processing speeds.

Our team finds anomalies no other technology can economically uncover.

We create a record of every anomaly, tying it to a government or other trusted source, like a property tax record, a Google street-view photo, and publish the aggregated results.

In some states we support challenges to an ineligible address receiving a mail-in ballot.  

Should a ballot be sent to an ineligible address, our team flags it, documents it and wherever possible, challenges it.  

In other states, there is no legal means to challenge a ballot.  We publish the anomalous categories of such ballots so citizens can determine if their election was on the level.

We are currently engaged in several states working with state officials.

We are working in one state with its Chief Auditor.

We are working in another state showing elected officials their voter roll anomalies.

Secretaries of State do not want their voter rolls exposed to Fractal quantum technology.  

In Texas, where the voter rolls are particularly bad, the Attorney General’s office had to intervene to force the Secretary of State to give us a voter roll we purchased.

We do not need government officials to be successful.

We are taking the donations from thousands of citizens and building PARALLEL SYSTEMS to the state voter roll.

In Wisconsin, we built a statewide database with 10 different copies of the voter rolls – each from a different date.  We add county property tax records and cross search with other official databases.

We show the incredible anomalies, on the current Wisconsin voter roll, to Wisconsin citizens – so their elected officials cannot continue to deny there are voter roll problems.

Clean voter rolls – in the day of mass mail-in balloting – are too important to be left to Secretaries of State using 1980s technology.

Our goal is to build PARALLEL SYSTEMS in many states.